Damashie Vrs Karimu [2023] GHADC 252 (18 January 2023)
The marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation due to respondent's persistent adultery, constructive desertion, and failure of the parties to reconcile their differences despite diligent effort, making it unreasonable to expect the petitioner to continue living with the respondent.
- Citation
- [2023] GHADC 252
- Parties
- Petitioner: Deborah Damashie; Respondent: Abudulai Karimu
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition for dissolution of marriage granted; marriage dissolved.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Causes, Adultery, Desertion, Irreconcilable Differences
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Deborah Damashie
Petitioner
Abudulai Karimu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the parties is broken down beyond reconciliation
- 2 Whether the Ordinance marriage between the parties should be dissolved
- 3 Whether the petitioner is entitled to her reliefs
Ratio Decidendi
The marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation due to respondent's persistent adultery, constructive desertion, and failure of the parties to reconcile their differences despite diligent effort, making it unreasonable to expect the petitioner to continue living with the respondent.
Court Disposition
Petition for dissolution of marriage granted; marriage dissolved.
Orders
- Marriage between Deborah Damashie and Abudulai Karimu dissolved.
- Respondent to pay costs of Gh¢5,000.00 to petitioner with interest at prevailing bank rate from date of judgment until fully paid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment