Achimota Preparatory & Junior High School Vrs Fourth Lucky Estate Company and Another [2023] GHAHC 13 (17 January 2023)
Plaintiff failed to pay ground rent and was served with proper notice of repossession by State Housing Company, which lawfully repossessed and reallocated the disputed land to the 2nd Defendant. Plaintiff's rights were extinguished, and Defendants' title prevails. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed and judgment entered for the 2nd Defendant as lessee of the land.
- Citation
- Achimota Preparatory & Junior High School Vrs Fourth Lucky Estate Company and Another [2023] GHAHC 13 (17 January 2023)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Achimota Preparatory & J.H.S.; 1st Defendant: Fourth Lucky Estate Company; 2nd Defendant: Ibistek
- Court
- ghahc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Land Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims dismissed; judgment for 2nd Defendant as lessee of the disputed land.
- Legal Topics
- Leasehold Interest, Repossession, Stamp Duty Compliance, Trespass, Injunction, Ground Rent Default
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Achimota Preparatory & J.H.S.
Plaintiff
Fourth Lucky Estate Company
1st Defendant
Ibistek
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Defendants are equitable owners of the disputed land
- 2 Whether State Housing Company granted a lease of the land in dispute to the Plaintiff
- 3 Whether Defendants are bona fide owners of the disputed land
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff failed to pay ground rent and was served with proper notice of repossession by State Housing Company, which lawfully repossessed and reallocated the disputed land to the 2nd Defendant. Plaintiff's rights were extinguished, and Defendants' title prevails. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed and judgment entered for the 2nd Defendant as lessee of the land.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims dismissed; judgment for 2nd Defendant as lessee of the disputed land.
Orders
- Plaintiff, its agents, assigns, workmen, privies or successors restrained from interfering with Defendants' property.
- Claim for general damages for trespass dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment