Republic Vrs High Court Accra and Another (ruling) [2016] GHACA 10 (17 February 2016)
The High Court lacked jurisdiction over the matter as it concerned chieftaincy, and only the judicial committee of the Ada Traditional Council is subject to the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] GHACA 10
- Parties
- Applicant: Ada Traditional Council; Respondent: High Court, Accra; Interested Party: Nomo Daker Osah
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Motion / Ruling on Application for Certiorari
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Certiorari, Chieftaincy Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ada Traditional Council
Applicant
High Court, Accra
Respondent
Nomo Daker Osah
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Motion / Ruling on Application for Certiorari
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction over a matter concerning chieftaincy involving the Ada Traditional Council
- 2 Whether the Ada Traditional Council is amenable to the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacked jurisdiction over the matter as it concerned chieftaincy, and only the judicial committee of the Ada Traditional Council is subject to the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Order of the High Court, Accra dated 24th July 2015 is brought up and quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
`IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT, ACCRA AD 2016 CORAM: ATUGUBA, JSC (PRESIDING) ADINYIRA (MRS), JSC YEBOAH, JSC BENIN, JSC AKAMBA, JSC CIVIL MOTION NO. J5/48/2015 THE REPUBLIC VRS 17TH FEBRUARY 2016 … HIGH COURT, ACCRA … RESPONDENT EX-PARTE THE ADA TRADITIONAL COUNCIL … APPLICANT NOMO DAKER OSAH … INTERESTED PARTY _______________________________________________ R U L I N G ATUGUBA, JSC: FACTS The Applicant moves this court “for an order of certiorari directed at the High Court, Accra to bring forth and to be quashed the Ruling of the Court presided over by Her Ladyship Justice Barbara Ward Acquah (Mrs.), on the ground that the High Court erred in exercising jurisdiction over the Ada Traditional Council, it not being its judicial committee. The crux of this matter is that the Kabiawetsu clan of Big Ada, allegedly nominated and installed Nomo Jonathan Dzabeku Abodoadzi as the Divisional Chief (Wetsoyi) in succession to the last deceased Wetsoyi of the said clan. The applicant, the Ada Traditional Council was notified of this installation and a date was fixed for the presentation of the new Wetsoyi to it, but the event was postponed. However on the 7th day of January 2013, the applicant rather had one Haruna Ocansey presented to it as the new Wetsoyi. Aggrieved, the Interested Party successfully applied and quashed the decision of the Ada Traditional Council by certiorari order of the High Court Accra, presided over by Mrs. Barbara Ward Acquah J, dated the 24th day of July, 2015. It is against this order that this present application, aforesaid, has been brought. The applicant’s contention is that it is not amenable to the supervisory jurisdiction of this court in a smuch as it is rather its judicial committee which is an inferior court and thus amendable to our said jurisdiction. We curtail this matter on the ground that the aforementioned application to the High Court presided over by Mrs. Barbara Ward Acquah J manifestly related to a cause or matter concerning chieftaincy, as it plainly was based on the question as to who was the rightful Divisional Chief or Wetsoyi nominated and installed by the Kubiawetsu clan. This is plain from s. 76(a) of the Chieftaincy Act, 2008, Act 759. The High Court therefore lacked jurisdiction over the matter. See In re Wa-Na; Republic v. Fijoli-Na; Ex parte Yakubu and others (1987-88)1 GLR 180 C. A. For all the foregoing reasons the application is granted. Let the order of the High Court, Accra presided over by Mrs. Barbara Ward Acquah J dated the 24th day of July 2015 be brought up before this court to be quashed and the same is hereby quashed. (SGD) W. A. ATUGUBA JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT (SGD) S. O. A. ADINYIRA (MRS) JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT (SGD) ANIN YEBOAH JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT (SGD) A. A. BENIN JUSTIC E OF THE SUPREME COURT (SGD) J. B. AKAMBA JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT COUNSEL JOSEPH NICOLAS NKRUMAH ESQ. FOR THE APPLICANT. J. A. LARKAI INTERESTED PARTY. 4