AGYEMANG VRS ADOMAKO (BR/KK/DC/A1/09/2024) [2024] GHADC 268 (31 May 2024)
Plaintiff proved entitlement to recovery of 2 bags of cocoa based on mathematical calculation and defendant's admission; claim for 30kg shortage not proved due to lack of credible evidence; defendant's counterclaim dismissed for lack of proof.
- Citation
- AGYEMANG VRS ADOMAKO (BR/KK/DC/A1/09/2024) [2024] GHADC 268 (31 May 2024)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Agyemang Emmanuel; Defendant: Adomako Gabriel
- Court
- ghadc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for 2 bags of cocoa allowed; claim for 30kg shortage dismissed; defendant's counterclaim dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Sale of Goods, Cocoa Supply, Burden of Proof, Counterclaim
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agyemang Emmanuel
Plaintiff
Adomako Gabriel
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether GH₵21,280.00 was meant for 28 or 26 bags of cocoa
- 2 Whether plaintiff is entitled to recovery of 2.5 bags of cocoa
- 3 Whether defendant is entitled to counterclaim of GH₵1,520.00
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff proved entitlement to recovery of 2 bags of cocoa based on mathematical calculation and defendant's admission; claim for 30kg shortage not proved due to lack of credible evidence; defendant's counterclaim dismissed for lack of proof.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for 2 bags of cocoa allowed; claim for 30kg shortage dismissed; defendant's counterclaim dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- Defendant to supply 2 bags of dry cocoa beans to plaintiff or pay current market value.
- Plaintiff's claim for 30kg shortage dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment