Gedel Suing Through His Lawful Attorney: Danjumah Karimu Ninche Vrs Accra Technical Universsity [2023] GHAHC 307 (13 July 2023)
The Plaintiff, being a Ghanaian resident temporarily abroad, has complied with the rules by providing a local address for service through his lawful attorney; the writ is proper and the application to strike out is refused.
- Citation
- [2023] GHAHC 307
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ahmed Mohammed Gedel; Attorney for Plaintiff: Danjumah Karimu Ninche; Defendant: Accra Technical University; Defendant: Prof. Samuel Nii Odai; Defendant: Rev. Prof. Emmanuel Adow Obeng; Defendant: Prof. Salomey Essuman; Defendant: Prof. Sylvester Kojo Danuor; Defendant: Engr. Dr. Stephen Turkson; Defendant: Prof. Ahmed Ginapor Abdulai; Defendant: Prof. Felix Kutsanedzie; Defendant: Dr. Shani Bashiru
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Capacity to Sue, Proper Party, Address for Service, Power of Attorney
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ahmed Mohammed Gedel
Plaintiff
Danjumah Karimu Ninche
Attorney for Plaintiff
Accra Technical University
Defendant
Prof. Samuel Nii Odai
Defendant
Rev. Prof. Emmanuel Adow Obeng
Defendant
Prof. Salomey Essuman
Defendant
Prof. Sylvester Kojo Danuor
Defendant
Engr. Dr. Stephen Turkson
Defendant
Prof. Ahmed Ginapor Abdulai
Defendant
Prof. Felix Kutsanedzie
Defendant
Dr. Shani Bashiru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff, temporarily resident abroad, has provided a proper address for service under the rules
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff has capacity to sue through a lawful attorney
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff, being a Ghanaian resident temporarily abroad, has complied with the rules by providing a local address for service through his lawful attorney; the writ is proper and the application to strike out is refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Cost of GH¢1,000 awarded against Defendants in Plaintiff’s favour
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment