Ali-imuran Yussif Vrs Mr. Gibril & Anor. [2023] GHACC 468 (13 June 2023)
The defendant, having been duly served and having failed to file any opposition, is deemed to have waived the right to oppose. The court, exercising its discretion under Order 25 of C. I. 47, finds it appropriate to grant the interlocutory injunction to preserve the land pending final determination of the suit.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] GHACC 468
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Ali-Imuran Yussif; Defendant/respondent: Mr. Gibril; Defendant/respondent: Other Trespassers
- Court
- Circuit Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application (injunction) Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for interlocutory injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunction, Waiver of Right to Oppose, Service of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ali-Imuran Yussif
Plaintiff/applicant
Mr. Gibril
Defendant/respondent
Other Trespassers
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application (injunction) Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the suit land pending determination of the suit
- 2 Whether the defendant has waived the right to oppose the application
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant, having been duly served and having failed to file any opposition, is deemed to have waived the right to oppose. The court, exercising its discretion under Order 25 of C. I. 47, finds it appropriate to grant the interlocutory injunction to preserve the land pending final determination of the suit.
Court Disposition
Application for interlocutory injunction granted
Orders
- All parties, their agents, servants, assigns, workmen, and any persons claiming through them are prohibited or restrained from entering, developing, or dealing with the land in dispute pending final determination of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT ‘2’ ADENTAN BEFORE HER HONOUR SEDINAM AWO BALOKAH (MS) THE PRESIDING JUDGE ON THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023 TIME: 9:16 AM SUIT NO. C1/005/2023 ALI-IMURAN YUSSIF PLAINTIFF AMANFROM ADENTA VRS. 1. MR. GIBRIL DEFENDANTS 2. OTHER TRESPASSERS Plaintiff Present D1 Present Babonyire Adafula Present for Plaintiff/Applicant J. A Lakai Absent for Defendant/Respondent By Court Defendant, are you opposed to the Motion for Interlocutory Injunction Order? Defendant (Twi): Yes By Court: Why has your lawyer not filed your Affidavit in Opposition since they were served on 10th May, 2023? Defendant (Twi): I do not know why. By court: Why is your lawyer absent today although he wrote to this court seeking an adjournment till today 13th June, 2023? (See letter to Registrar dated 19th May, 2023, Counsel for Defendant wrote seeking any adjournment to today). Defendant (Twi): He is in Tamale and will be arriving today. By Court: The Defendant was served with the Motion pending and all Annexures on 10th May, 2023 at 4:02 pm through his lawyer’s clerk Prince Addo at South Industrial Area (see Affidavit of service by Amewugah Ablordeppey court bailiff). Counsel for Defendant further wrote a letter to the Registrar of this court letter dated 19th May, 2023 seeking an adjournment to today 13th June, 2023. However, Defendant has not filed any opposition to the pending Motion for an Interlocutory Injunction Order. Considering all the above, the court deems the Defendant has waived his right to file any Affidavit in Opposition and Statement of case through his Counsel on record. In circumstance, the Motion shall be heard and determined on its merit. Counsel for Plaintiff/Applicant: We move in terms of the Motion paper, supporting Affidavit. We rely on all Annexures and Statement of case. We pray accordingly. By Court – Ruling: In order to prevent the land in issue from being manipulated or changed in such a manner that the award of damages will not suffice as compensation, the court in the exercise of its discretion and per Order 25 of C. I. 47 as amended deems it appropriate considering the fact deposed to by Applicant herein and an argument canvassed per the statement of case filed for the Applicant by his Counsel to grant the Application. The Application is therefore granted as follows only; The Parties herein, their agents, servants, assigns, workmen and all other person or group of persons claiming and or through or under them are by this Interlocutory Injunction Order PROHIBITED or RESTRAINED from going on, entering into, developing or dealing with the land the subject matter of this suit by whatsoever description given to same by the Parties herein, in anyway whatsoever pending the final determination of this instant suit. This suit shall its ordinary course herefrom. (SGD) H/H SEDINAM AWO BALOKAH CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Comfy* 4