DARKO VRS. SACKEY (A1/10/20) [2025] GHADC 14 (14 January 2025)
The Plaintiff failed to prove that the Asona family still owned the land at the time of the purported gift, as evidence showed a prior grant had already been made to the Defendant's grantor. Consequently, the Plaintiff's title is void and she is not entitled to the reliefs sought.
- Citation
- [2025] GHADC 14
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alice Constance Naana Darko; Defendant: Dr. Sackey
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2025
- Case Number
- A1/10/20
- Procedural Posture
- Land Dispute / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Title, Customary Land Gift, Prior Grant, Burden of Proof, Injunction, Damages for Trespass
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alice Constance Naana Darko
Plaintiff
Dr. Sackey
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the customary gift through which the Plaintiff claims to have acquired the land in contention from the Asona Family is valid
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff failed to prove that the Asona family still owned the land at the time of the purported gift, as evidence showed a prior grant had already been made to the Defendant's grantor. Consequently, the Plaintiff's title is void and she is not entitled to the reliefs sought.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff is not entitled to any of her reliefs
- Cost of GHS 20,000 awarded against the Plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment