Ghana Judgment

ghacc

Venatius Amanyo & Anor. Vrs Jonathan Tetteh & Anor. [2022] GHACC 280 (16 November 2022)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The amendment is necessary to promote justice and determine the real issue in dispute, and there is no opposition from the respondents.

Court disposition

Application to amend statement of claim granted; costs awarded against plaintiffs/applicants.

Orders

  • Application to amend statement of claim granted
  • Plaintiffs/Applicants to pay costs of GHȼ1,000.00

02

Material facts

Parties

Venatius Amanyo

Plaintiff/applicant Counsel: Dora Ocquaye Nortey

Netas Properties & Invest. Ltd

Plaintiff/applicant Counsel: Dora Ocquaye Nortey

Jonathan Tetteh

Defendant/respondent Counsel: M. Dodoo for Maxwell Mensah

Elvis Narh

Defendant/respondent Counsel: M. Dodoo for Maxwell Mensah

Amounts and remedies

  • Costs Awarded Against Plaintiffs/applicants: GHS 1,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Ruling on Motion to Amend Statement of Claim

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the plaintiffs/applicants should be granted leave to amend their statement of claim

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants argued that material facts were omitted from the original pleadings and amendment is necessary to determine all issues in controversy. They relied on Order 16 of CI 47, which allows amendments at any stage before judgment.
Respondent
Respondents did not file any affidavit in opposition.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order 16 of CI 47

    Court has discretion to allow amendment of pleadings at any stage before judgment to determine the real question in controversy.

  2. 02

    Justice S. A. Brobbey, Trial Courts and Tribunals of Ghana, 2nd Edition, page 297

    The test for amendment is whether it will promote the course of justice and is necessary for determining material issues in dispute.

  3. 03

    Practical Guide to Civil Procedure In Ghana by Justice Marfo-Sau

    Court's discretion to allow amendment must be exercised judicially.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The amendment is necessary to promote justice and determine the real issue in dispute, and there is no opposition from the respondents.

Court disposition

Application to amend statement of claim granted; costs awarded against plaintiffs/applicants.

  • Application to amend statement of claim granted
  • Plaintiffs/Applicants to pay costs of GHȼ1,000.00

Source and reliance status

ghacc · 16 November 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

ghacc

Judgment· 16 November 2022

Venatius Amanyo & Anor. Vrs Jonathan Tetteh & Anor. [2022] GHACC 280 (16 November 2022)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JUSTICE, SITTING AT ASHAIMAN ON WEDNESDAY THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER , 2022. BEFORE HIS

HONOUR SIMON GAGA SUIT NO: C2/06/22 1. VENATIUS AMANYO PLAINTIFFS/APPLICANTS OF COMMUNITY 24 HILLS,

TEMA 2. NETAS PROPERTIES & INVEST. LTD OSU, BEHIND PHOTO CLUB VRS 1. JONATHAN TETTEH DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS ODUMASE – DODOWA 2. ELVIS NARH

OF DODOWA ________________ ____

RULING ON MOTION ON NOTICE TO AMEND STATEMENT OF CLAIM __________________ Before this Court is an Application filed on 25th day of May, 2022 by the Plaintiffs/applicants for an Order of Amendment of the Statement of Claim of paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15 and substitute same with paragraphs 1 to 18 of a proposed Amended Statement of Claim which is marked as Exhibit ‘A’. However, the Applicants, on 19th day of September, 2022, filed a Supplementary Affidavit in support to amend the whole Statement of Claim and substitute it with another one. Counsel attached a proposed Amended Statement of Claim and same is marked as Exhibit ‘A’. 1

THE CASE OF THE APPLICANTS The gist of the Applicant’s case is stemmed from the Motion on Notice and the affidavit in support together with the supplementary affidavit. According to the Applicant, he instituted an action against the Defendants/Respondents for a Declaration of Title to all that piece of land situate and lying at Odumase Dodowa in the Dangbe West District of which the Defendants have trespassed on same. He deposed that after initiating the suit he realized that there were some material facts that have not been pleaded. He therefore prayed for an Order to enable him to amend the pleadings so that all the issues in controversy would be effectively and completely determined. It is to be noted that the Respondents did not file any affidavit in opposition. The Court ordered the Applicant to move the application. SUBMISSION BY COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPLICANTS Counsel repeated all the depositions of the affidavits in support. Counsel referred the Court to Order 16 of CI 47, which permits amendments to be made at every point of the proceedings of a suit even on appeal.

APPLICABLE LAW I believe that the application is grounded on Order 16 of CI 47, which provides in substance that at any stage before judgments are signed or entered, the Court has power to order any Writ, Title or pleadings of a suit to be amended. The amendment may be ordered at the instance of the Court or at the instance of any of the parties. The underlining consideration for refusing or granting any amendment is to enable the Court to determine the real question in controversy between the parties. See (1) Justice S. A. Brobbey’s Book, Trial Courts and Tribunals of Ghana, 2nd Edition @ page 297. The power of the Court to allow parties to amend is discretionary, but must be exercised judicially. The general test is whether or not the amendment will 2 promote the course of justice as between the parties and is necessary for the purpose of determining the material issues in dispute. See Practical Guide to Civil Procedure In Ghana by Justice Marfo-Sau. It is worthy of note that since the Respondent did not file any affidavit in opposition, there is no need for the Court to comment on same. I have carefully studied the submission by Counsel and I have realized that the real issue in contention is the disputed land. As Brobbey, JSC, indicted in his book, Courts and Tribunals of Ghana, the underlying consideration for refusing or granting any amendment is to enable the Court to

determine the real question in controversy between the parties. I am tempted to believe that the amendment of the pleadings is meant to promote the course of justice between the parties and is also necessary for the purpose of determining the material issue in dispute. I therefore grant the application. I award cost of GHȼ1,000.00 against the Plaintiffs/Applicants. (SGD) (H/H) SIMON GAGA (CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE) 1. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPLICANTS

DORA OCQUAYE NORTEY 2. COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS M. DODOO FOR MAXWELL MENSAH. 3 OAAQ/. 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order 16 of CI 47

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.