Vitine v Cameroon (Communication 106 of 1993) [1994] ACHPR 8 (27 April 1994)
The Commission decided not to take up the matter by applying article 55, indicating the communication was inadmissible.
- Citation
- [1994] ACHPR 8
- Parties
- Applicant: Amuh Joseph Vitine; Respondent: Cameroon
- Court
- African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 1994
- Case Number
- Communication 106 of 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Communication / Final Decision
- Outcome
- communication declared inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Persecution, Refugee Status
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Amuh Joseph Vitine
Applicant
Cameroon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Communication / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commission should intervene to stop alleged persecution of the applicant by the government of Cameroon
- 2 Whether the Commission should appeal to Senegal and Niger to grant the applicant refugee status
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission decided not to take up the matter by applying article 55, indicating the communication was inadmissible.
Court Disposition
communication declared inadmissible
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment