Republic Vrs Gbemadeko [2022] GHADC 294 (3 October 2022)
The accused admitted to hitting the complainant with the back of a cutlass during a misunderstanding, and the court found that this constituted unlawful assault as the use of force was not justified under the law. The accused's claim of self-defence was not supported by the evidence, and the slightest actual touch with the required intention suffices for assault and battery under the law.
- Citation
- [2022] GHADC 294
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Dzogbeshie Gbemadeko; Complainant: Aku Gbemadeko
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 3 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Burden of Proof, Self Defence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Dzogbeshie Gbemadeko
Accused
Aku Gbemadeko
Complainant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully assaulted the complainant
- 2 Whether the accused's use of force was justified as self-defence
Ratio Decidendi
The accused admitted to hitting the complainant with the back of a cutlass during a misunderstanding, and the court found that this constituted unlawful assault as the use of force was not justified under the law. The accused's claim of self-defence was not supported by the evidence, and the slightest actual touch with the required intention suffices for assault and battery under the law.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence
Orders
- The accused is convicted of assault and sentenced to a fine of twenty-five (25) penalty units.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment