ADAM VRS NEIDOW (A1/14/24) [2024] GHADC 391 (5 July 2024)
Plaintiff failed to lead admissible and credible evidence that defendant trespassed onto the disputed plot; contradictions in plaintiff's testimony and lack of proof resulted in dismissal of the claim.
- Citation
- ADAM VRS NEIDOW (A1/14/24) [2024] GHADC 391 (5 July 2024)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ayishetu Adam; Defendant: Stephen Abraham Neidow
- Court
- ghadc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 5 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- plaintiff's action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Land Title, Trespass, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Ayishetu Adam
Plaintiff
Stephen Abraham Neidow
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant trespassed onto plot no. 339, Kpanvo Residential Area Block B
- 2 Whether plaintiff proved entitlement to the disputed plot
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff failed to lead admissible and credible evidence that defendant trespassed onto the disputed plot; contradictions in plaintiff's testimony and lack of proof resulted in dismissal of the claim.
Court Disposition
plaintiff's action dismissed
Orders
- Costs of GHS1,000.00 awarded in favour of defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment