Mohammed Vrs The Republic [2023] GHAHC 248 (8 March 2023)
The trial judge erred in law by imposing consecutive sentences for offences committed in one criminal transaction, contrary to sections 302 and 303 of Act 30. The sentence was harsh and excessive and is substituted with the minimum sentence for robbery.
- Citation
- [2023] GHAHC 248
- Parties
- Appellant: Bello Mohammed; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 8 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appeal, Robbery
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bello Mohammed
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 47 years imprisonment imposed on the appellant was harsh and excessive
- 2 Whether the sentences should have been ordered to run consecutively or concurrently
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred in law by imposing consecutive sentences for offences committed in one criminal transaction, contrary to sections 302 and 303 of Act 30. The sentence was harsh and excessive and is substituted with the minimum sentence for robbery.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Sentence of 47 years imprisonment set aside
- Appellant sentenced to 10 years imprisonment being the minimum sentence for robbery
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment