Okeke and Others Vrs The Republic [2012] GHASC 24 (30 May 2012)

Okeke and Others Vrs The Republic [2012] GHASC 24 (30 May 2012)

No substantial miscarriage of justice was occasioned by any procedural irregularity or alleged misdirection. The prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, the appellants were not prejudiced by any amendment or omission, and the appeal fails in its entirety.

Citation
[2012] GHASC 24
Parties
Appellant: Ben Okeke; Appellant: Prince Umeh a.k.a Sakora; Appellant: Joshua Chuku; Appellant: Emeka Osendo; Respondent: The Republic
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
30 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed
Legal Topics
Conspiracy to Commit Robbery, Robbery, Criminal Procedure, Appeals, Burden of Proof, Alibi, Jury Directions
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ben Okeke

Appellant

Prince Umeh a.k.a Sakora

Appellant

Joshua Chuku

Appellant

Emeka Osendo

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether non-compliance with sections 187 and 188 of Act 30 rendered the committal proceedings a nullity
  2. 2 Whether amendment to the Bill of Indictment after prosecution case occasioned a miscarriage of justice
  3. 3 Whether there was misdirection or non-direction of the jury regarding alibi

Ratio Decidendi

No substantial miscarriage of justice was occasioned by any procedural irregularity or alleged misdirection. The prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, the appellants were not prejudiced by any amendment or omission, and the appeal fails in its entirety.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed