BOBIE VRS. OWUSU (BR.KS/A11/24/2024) [2024] GHADC 459 (13 August 2024)
The plaintiff proved on a preponderance of probabilities that the structure in dispute was part of the 48 speculative structures constructed by Richard Osei Boakye, was gifted to him, and the defendant failed to provide credible evidence to the contrary. The embargo placed by the defendant was unjustified.
- Citation
- BOBIE VRS. OWUSU (BR.KS/A11/24/2024) [2024] GHADC 459 (13 August 2024)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Bobie Mensah Maxwell; Defendant: Victor Osei Owusu
- Court
- ghadc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff in part
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Compensation, Injunction, Damages, Land Ownership
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bobie Mensah Maxwell
Plaintiff
Victor Osei Owusu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Richard Osei Boakye constructed 48 speculative structures on defendant’s land and shared same with him
- 2 Whether the defendant sold 6 of his speculative houses to Richard Boakye
- 3 Whether the structure in dispute formed part of Richard Osei Boakye’s share of the 48 structures
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff proved on a preponderance of probabilities that the structure in dispute was part of the 48 speculative structures constructed by Richard Osei Boakye, was gifted to him, and the defendant failed to provide credible evidence to the contrary. The embargo placed by the defendant was unjustified.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff in part
Orders
- Embargo placed on the structure described in the plaintiff’s writ of summons to be removed
- Claim for general damages of GH¢10,000 dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment