Republic Vrs Kwakye and 2 Others [2023] GHACC 296 (10 February 2023)
A1's voluntary confession, both in cautioned statement and sworn evidence, established his guilt for causing unlawful damage, unlawful entry, and stealing. A3's own cautioned statement and failure to provide a credible explanation for possession of stolen items, combined with A1's sworn evidence, proved guilt for dishonestly receiving. There was insufficient admissible evidence against A2 to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as A1's out-of-court statement was inadmissible against A2 and no corroborating evidence was provided.
- Citation
- Republic Vrs Kwakye and 2 Others [2023] GHACC 296 (10 February 2023)
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused (a1): Michael Kwakye; Accused (a2): Prince Oteng @ Papapii; Accused (a3): Abdul Rahman Issah; Complainant: Mary Adu
- Court
- ghacc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- A1 convicted on all counts and referred to Juvenile Court for sentencing; A3 convicted and sentenced to fine and bond; A2 acquitted and discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Causing Unlawful Damage, Unlawful Entry, Stealing, Dishonestly Receiving, Burden of Proof, Standard of Proof, Confession, Admissibility of Evidence, Sentencing, Juvenile Justice
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Michael Kwakye
Accused (a1)
Prince Oteng @ Papapii
Accused (a2)
Abdul Rahman Issah
Accused (a3)
Mary Adu
Complainant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that A1 committed causing unlawful damage, unlawful entry, and stealing; whether A3 dishonestly received stolen property; whether A2 dishonestly received or assisted in the disposal of stolen property
Ratio Decidendi
A1's voluntary confession, both in cautioned statement and sworn evidence, established his guilt for causing unlawful damage, unlawful entry, and stealing. A3's own cautioned statement and failure to provide a credible explanation for possession of stolen items, combined with A1's sworn evidence, proved guilt for dishonestly receiving. There was insufficient admissible evidence against A2 to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as A1's out-of-court statement was inadmissible against A2 and no corroborating evidence was provided.
Court Disposition
A1 convicted on all counts and referred to Juvenile Court for sentencing; A3 convicted and sentenced to fine and bond; A2 acquitted and discharged.
Orders
- A1 to be taken to Juvenile Court at Nkawkaw for sentencing; Registry to transmit record to Juvenile Court.
- A3 to pay a fine of 200 penalty units or serve 12 months imprisonment in default.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment