Ghana Judgment

Circuit Court

Charles Komiete-amoo Vrs 3 Ams-clems, & Anor. [2023] GHACC 264 (3 October 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The defendant failed to file a statement of defence after entering appearance; therefore, judgment in default of defence is granted under Order 13 rule 1.

Court disposition

judgment for plaintiff in default of defence

Orders

  • Defendants to pay rent arrears of $22,938.99 or its cedi equivalent.
  • Defendants to pay costs of GH¢1,000.
  • Defendants to pay minimum level of legal fees as determined by the Ghana Bar Association.

02

Material facts

Parties

Charles Komiete-Amoo

Plaintiff Counsel: Justice Tsakpoe holding brief for Chris Baffour-Awuah

3 AMS-CLEMS

1st Defendant

Clifford Mate-Korley

2nd Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Rent Arrears: USD 22,938.99
  • Costs: GHS 1,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Judgment in Default of Defence

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to judgment in default of defence for rent arrears.

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiff moved for judgment in default of defence under Order 13, relying on the motion paper, supporting affidavit, and evidence attached, seeking payment of rent arrears.
Respondent
No defence filed; defendants absent.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order 13 rule 1 of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (C. I. 47)

    Judgment may be entered in default of defence where no defence is filed after appearance.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The defendant failed to file a statement of defence after entering appearance; therefore, judgment in default of defence is granted under Order 13 rule 1.

Court disposition

judgment for plaintiff in default of defence

  • Defendants to pay rent arrears of $22,938.99 or its cedi equivalent.
  • Defendants to pay costs of GH¢1,000.
  • Defendants to pay minimum level of legal fees as determined by the Ghana Bar Association.

Source and reliance status

Circuit Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Circuit Court

Judgment

[2023] GHACC 264

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT ‘1’, ADENTAN, ACCRA, BEFORE HER HONOUR JUDGE DORA G. A. INKUMSAH ESHUN (MRS.) SITTING ON MONDAY THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 SUIT NO. C2/001/2023 CHARLES KOMIETE-AMOO

PLAINTIFF V. 3 AMS-CLEMS CLIFFORD MATE-KORLEY Parties 1ST DEFENDANT 2ND DEFENDANT Plaintiff-applicant – represented by Jerome Dag Amoo (son) 1st and 2nd defendants – absent Representation Plaintiff counsel – present; Justice Tsakpoe holding brief for Chris Baffour- Awuah Defendant counsel – absent Plaintiff Counsel My lady, respectfully, we have a motion on notice for judgment in default of defence under Order 13. We move in terms of the motion paper, supporting affidavit and evidence attached. RULING – MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT OF DEFENCE The Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim were filed on 5th August 2022, for an order for payment of rent arrears amounting to $22,938.99 or its cedi equivalent. The defendant entered appearance on 16th August 2022 through his counsel Leslie Oku of Oriental Law Consult. A Search filed on 8 September 2022 revealed that the defendant had not filed a Statement of Defence. There is currently no Statement of Defence on the docket. The motion for judgment in default of defence was served on the defendant on 27 September 2022 through his lawyer’s clerk, Wisdom Nyadevu at Tesano, with no defence subsequently being filed on the docket. The motion is therefore granted under Order 13 rule 1 of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (C. I. 47). Costs of GH¢1,000 are awarded against the defendant and the minimum level of legal fees as determined by the Ghana Bar Association applicable to this case are also awarded against the defendant. (SGD) DORA G. A. INKUMSAH ESHUN

CIRCUIT JUDGE 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order 13 rule 1 of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (C. I. 47)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.