Kwofie Vrs: Dampare and 3 Others [2023] GHAHC 16 (8 June 2023)
It was inappropriate for the defendants to file a motion to strike out their names after entering conditional appearance, as their complaint was not among the grounds justifying conditional appearance and should be raised in pleadings.
- Citation
- [2023] GHAHC 16
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Daniel Kwofie; Defendant/applicant: Dr. George Akuffo Dampare; Defendant/applicant: C. O. P Christian Tetteh Yohunu; Defendant/applicant: A. S. P Emelia Owusu-Ansah
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 8 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights / Ruling on Motion to Strike Out Defendants as Parties
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Appearance, Proper Parties, Striking Out Parties
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Kwofie
Plaintiff/respondent
Dr. George Akuffo Dampare
Defendant/applicant
C. O. P Christian Tetteh Yohunu
Defendant/applicant
A. S. P Emelia Owusu-Ansah
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Human Rights / Ruling on Motion to Strike Out Defendants as Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants are proper parties to the suit
- 2 Whether a motion to strike out defendants as parties is appropriate after entering conditional appearance
Ratio Decidendi
It was inappropriate for the defendants to file a motion to strike out their names after entering conditional appearance, as their complaint was not among the grounds justifying conditional appearance and should be raised in pleadings.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment