REPUBLIC VRS IBRAHIM & 2 OTHERS (B18/145/23) [2024] GHADC 389 (23 January 2024)
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Shaibu Tanko Ibrahim conspired with Abdul Karim and Abdul Rahaman to defraud the complainant by false pretence, and the defence's claim of victimhood was found to be fabricated and not credible.
- Citation
- REPUBLIC VRS IBRAHIM & 2 OTHERS (B18/145/23) [2024] GHADC 389 (23 January 2024)
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Shaibu Tanko Ibrahim; Accused: Abdul Karim; Accused: Abdul Rahaman; Complainant: Abass Laminu Kadiri
- Court
- ghadc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy, Defrauding by False Pretence, Burden of Proof, Sentencing
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Shaibu Tanko Ibrahim
Accused
Abdul Karim
Accused
Abdul Rahaman
Accused
Abass Laminu Kadiri
Complainant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Shaibu Tanko Ibrahim conspired with others to defraud by false pretence
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Shaibu Tanko Ibrahim conspired with Abdul Karim and Abdul Rahaman to defraud the complainant by false pretence, and the defence's claim of victimhood was found to be fabricated and not credible.
Court Disposition
conviction
Orders
- Shaibu Tanko Ibrahim is convicted on both counts: conspiracy to commit crime to wit defrauding by false pretence and defrauding by false pretence.
- Shaibu Tanko Ibrahim is to pay a fine of 500 penalty units (GHS6,000.00) and serve a jail term of one month in hard labour.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment