REPUBLIC VRS. AHIAVI AND ANOTHER (CR/0163/2020) [2023] GHAHC 625 (30 November 2023)
The statutory declarations in question were not judicial documents as defined by law; therefore, the prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients of the offences charged, and the accused persons could not be convicted on those counts.
- Citation
- [2023] GHAHC 625
- Parties
- Prosecution: Republic; 1st Accused: David Ahiavi; 2nd Accused: Antoinette Dzaka
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2023
- Case Number
- CR/0163/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- acquittal and discharge
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy, Forgery, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Prosecution
David Ahiavi
1st Accused
Antoinette Dzaka
2nd Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused persons conspired to commit forgery of a judicial or official document
- 2 Whether the accused persons forged a judicial or official document
- 3 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory declarations in question were not judicial documents as defined by law; therefore, the prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients of the offences charged, and the accused persons could not be convicted on those counts.
Court Disposition
acquittal and discharge
Orders
- The accused persons are acquitted and discharged on both count one and count two.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment