MINTAH VRS BONSU (G/AC/DG/A11/28/23) [2023] GHADC 845 (13 December 2023)
The plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that the tenancy agreement expired and the 2nd defendant occupies the store without legal right. The defendants did not contest the claim, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover possession and costs.
- Citation
- [2023] GHADC 845
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Constance Oduro Mintah; Defendant: Derrick Osei Bonsu; Defendant: Mr. Kwakye
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2023
- Case Number
- G/AC/DG/A11/28/23
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Ejectment, Tenancy Agreement, Vacant Possession, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Constance Oduro Mintah
Plaintiff
Derrick Osei Bonsu
Defendant
Mr. Kwakye
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to immediate ejectment of the 2nd defendant from the store
- 2 Whether the 2nd defendant has any legal right to occupy the store after expiration of the tenancy agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that the tenancy agreement expired and the 2nd defendant occupies the store without legal right. The defendants did not contest the claim, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover possession and costs.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff
Orders
- Plaintiff entitled to recover the store from the 2nd defendant
- Defendants to pay costs of GHȻ 1,000.00 to the plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment