REPUBLIC VRS. TAY AND ANOTHER , EX PARTE: MISYL ENERGY COMPANY LTD (CR/0140/2020) [2025] GHAHC 4 (20 February 2025)

REPUBLIC VRS. TAY AND ANOTHER , EX PARTE: MISYL ENERGY COMPANY LTD (CR/0140/2020) [2025] GHAHC 4 (20 February 2025)

The application for stay of proceedings was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting the exercise of the court's discretion. The court found that the respondent would suffer hardship if the stay was granted, and that the hearing of the contempt and preservation motion would not render the appeal nugatory.

Citation
[2025] GHAHC 4
Parties
Applicant/respondent: Misyl Energy Company Ltd; Respondent/applicant: Kwasi Osei Ofori
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
20 February 2025
Case Number
CR/0140/2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal/contempt Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of proceedings refused
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Stay of Proceedings, Restitution, Interlocutory Appeal
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Stay of Proceedings Restitution Interlocutory Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Misyl Energy Company Ltd

Applicant/respondent

Kwasi Osei Ofori

Respondent/applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal/contempt Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of proceedings pending appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether exceptional circumstances exist to warrant a stay of proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The application for stay of proceedings was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting the exercise of the court's discretion. The court found that the respondent would suffer hardship if the stay was granted, and that the hearing of the contempt and preservation motion would not render the appeal nugatory.

Court Disposition

Application for stay of proceedings refused

Orders

  • Case adjourned to 26th February 2025 for ruling on contempt and preservation application
  • Cost of GH¢3,000.00 awarded against the applicant