Kofi and Others Vrs Tamakloe and Other [2005] GHACA 10 (15 April 2005)
The appellants, with knowledge of pending litigation challenging the installation of the 4th appellant, deliberately completed the outdooring ceremony, thereby interfering with the judicial process and bringing the administration of justice into disrepute. The installation of the Awoamefia is a process, not a single event, and the appellants' actions constituted contempt of court.
- Citation
- [2005] GHACA 10
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Amega Kofi Togobo; Applicant/respondent: Lt. Col. (Rtd) Courage Togobo; Applicant/respondent: Amega C. N. Kwawukume; Applicant/respondent: Amega Seth K. A. Kwawukume; Respondent/appellant: Nugblanua Eha II; Respondent/appellant: Togbui Honi of Klikor; Respondent/appellant: Togbui Addo VIII of Klokor; Respondent/appellant: Amega Dotse Gagadosu Agboada; Respondent/appellant: Amega Patrick Agbogba
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contempt Proceedings, Chieftaincy Succession, Interference With Judicial Process, Customary Installation Procedures
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amega Kofi Togobo
Applicant/respondent
Lt. Col. (Rtd) Courage Togobo
Applicant/respondent
Amega C. N. Kwawukume
Applicant/respondent
Amega Seth K. A. Kwawukume
Applicant/respondent
Nugblanua Eha II
Respondent/appellant
Togbui Honi of Klikor
Respondent/appellant
Togbui Addo VIII of Klokor
Respondent/appellant
Amega Dotse Gagadosu Agboada
Respondent/appellant
Amega Patrick Agbogba
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants' conduct in outdooring the 4th appellant during pending petitions and motions constituted contempt of court
- 2 Whether the installation of the Awoamefia is a process or a single event under Anlo custom
- 3 Whether the appellants were aware of the pending litigation and acted in defiance of it
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants, with knowledge of pending litigation challenging the installation of the 4th appellant, deliberately completed the outdooring ceremony, thereby interfering with the judicial process and bringing the administration of justice into disrepute. The installation of the Awoamefia is a process, not a single event, and the appellants' actions constituted contempt of court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction and sentence for contempt of court against the appellants affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment