Ghana Judgment

ghacc

Republic Vrs Ackon [2023] GHACC 432 (28 March 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court, after considering the cases of both the accused and prosecution, found the accused guilty of all charges.

Court disposition

convicted

Orders

  • Accused remanded into police custody for sentencing on 31st March, 2023

02

Material facts

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution

Stephen Ackon

Accused

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the accused is guilty of the charges laid against him

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    general criminal law

    Burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court, after considering the cases of both the accused and prosecution, found the accused guilty of all charges.

Court disposition

convicted

  • Accused remanded into police custody for sentencing on 31st March, 2023

Source and reliance status

ghacc · 28 March 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

ghacc

Judgment· 28 March 2023

Republic Vrs Ackon [2023] GHACC 432 (28 March 2023)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT HELD AT CAPE COAST ON TUESDAY THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE HER HONOUR VERONIQUE PRABA TETTEH (MRS.), CIRCUIT JUDGE 99/2023

THE REPUBLIC

VS

STEPHEN ACKON

JUDGMENT Having carefully considered the case of both the accused and prosecution, I am satisfied and find the accused guilty of the charges laid against him. He is convicted on all counts. Accused is remanded into police custody for sentencing on 31st March, 2023. …………………………………… H/H VERONIQUE PRABA TETTEH (MRS) (CIRCUIT JUDGE)

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.