Customs Execise and Preventive Service Vrs National Labour Commission [2009] GHASC 8 (4 February 2009)
The majority held that the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651) applies to CEPS and its workers, as CEPS is not expressly excluded as a security or intelligence agency under Act 526. The constitutional right to unionise (Article 24(3)) applies to CEPS, subject to restrictions prescribed by law for national security or public...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] GHASC 8
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Customs Excise & Preventive Service; Defendant: National Labour Commission; Defendant: Attorney-General (joined for opinion); Interested Party: Public Services Workers’ Union of GTUC
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 4 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's action dismissed (majority); one dissenting judgment for plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Unionise, Interpretation of Statutes, National Security, Jurisdiction of Supreme Court, Collective Bargaining
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Customs Excise & Preventive Service
Plaintiff
National Labour Commission
Defendant
Attorney-General (joined for opinion)
Defendant
Public Services Workers’ Union of GTUC
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651) applies to Customs, Excise & Preventive Service (CEPS) and its workers.
- 2 Whether CEPS is a security or intelligence agency excluded from the Labour Act under section 1 and the Security and Intelligence Agencies Act, 1996 (Act 526).
- 3 Whether the application of the Labour Act to CEPS is inconsistent with Article 24(4) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651) applies to CEPS and its workers, as CEPS is not expressly excluded as a security or intelligence agency under Act 526. The constitutional right to unionise (Article 24(3)) applies to CEPS, subject to restrictions prescribed by law for national security or public order, which are already adequately provided for in existing statutes. There is no compelling necessity to exclude CEPS from unionising, and such exclusion would be unconstitutional. The plaintiff's action is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's action dismissed (majority); one dissenting judgment for plaintiff.
Orders
- Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651) applies to CEPS and its workers.
- CEPS workers have the right to unionise, subject to restrictions prescribed by law for national security or public order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment