NSIAH VRS EFISAH (CCD/C4/28/23) [2023] GHACC 775 (16 January 2023)
The petitioner proved adultery and irreconcilable differences under Section 2(1)(a) and (f) of Act 367, and the respondent did not contest the allegations. The best interest of the child requires custody to the mother, with maintenance and access orders in place.
- Citation
- [2023] GHACC 775
- Parties
- Petitioner: Regina Owusu Nsiah; Respondent: Daniel Kofi Efisah
- Court
- Circuit Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2023
- Case Number
- CCD/C4/28/23
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Child Custody, Child Maintenance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina Owusu Nsiah
Petitioner
Daniel Kofi Efisah
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation and should be dissolved
- 2 Whether custody of the child should be granted to the petitioner with access to the respondent
- 3 Whether the respondent should be ordered to maintain the child with a specified amount and pay school and hospital expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioner proved adultery and irreconcilable differences under Section 2(1)(a) and (f) of Act 367, and the respondent did not contest the allegations. The best interest of the child requires custody to the mother, with maintenance and access orders in place.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- Marriage between the parties dissolved and certificate cancelled
- Custody of the child granted to the petitioner with reasonable access to the respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment