Gateway Worship Center Vrs Soon [2009] GHASC 7 (21 January 2009)
The Circuit Court had jurisdiction to apply equitable principles and determine the trust issue; the appellant held the funds and land on a constructive trust for the church; the trust was completely constituted and enforceable by the church, even as a volunteer; the first respondent (pastor) was not a proper party and was struck out.
- Citation
- [2009] GHASC 7
- Parties
- Respondent: Gateway Worship Centre; Appellant: David Soon Boon Seo; Respondent (struck Out): Ben Adjei
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed except as to striking out the first respondent as a party.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Fiduciary Duty, Jurisdiction, Locus Standi, Company Law
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gateway Worship Centre
Respondent
David Soon Boon Seo
Appellant
Ben Adjei
Respondent (struck Out)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Circuit Court had jurisdiction to apply principles of trusts and equity in land matters
- 2 Whether the first respondent had locus standi
- 3 Whether the appellant held the funds and land on trust for the church
Ratio Decidendi
The Circuit Court had jurisdiction to apply equitable principles and determine the trust issue; the appellant held the funds and land on a constructive trust for the church; the trust was completely constituted and enforceable by the church, even as a volunteer; the first respondent (pastor) was not a proper party and was struck out.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed except as to striking out the first respondent as a party.
Orders
- First respondent (pastor) struck out as a party; he ceases to be a party to the action.
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal upheld; reliefs granted to the church (2nd respondent) maintained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment