D/cpl Michael Tetteh Adhulu Vrs D/cpl Abigail Enyonam Tuprah [2023] GHACC 133 (24 February 2023)
The petitioner proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondent committed adultery and that the marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation. The respondent did not contest the allegations or participate in the proceedings. The court was satisfied that the marriage was irretrievably broken and granted the divorce.
- Citation
- [2023] GHACC 133
- Parties
- Petitioner: D/CPL. Michael Tetteh Ahulu; Respondent: D/CPL. Abigail Enyonam Tuprah
- Court
- Circuit Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition for divorce granted
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Adultery, Child Custody, Maintenance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D/CPL. Michael Tetteh Ahulu
Petitioner
D/CPL. Abigail Enyonam Tuprah
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether or not the marriage celebrated between the petitioner and the respondent has broken down beyond reconciliation
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioner proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondent committed adultery and that the marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation. The respondent did not contest the allegations or participate in the proceedings. The court was satisfied that the marriage was irretrievably broken and granted the divorce.
Court Disposition
petition for divorce granted
Orders
- Decree for dissolution of the ordinance marriage celebrated on 1st August, 2015 at the Presbyterian Church of Ghana Ramseyer Congregation, Adum Kumasi.
- Petitioner to present the original marriage certificate No RMC/10/2015 for cancellation by the Registrar of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment