REPUBLIC VRS. OFORI (CCD/CC6/11/24) [2025] GHAHC 24 (23 January 2025)
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused, Stephen Ofori, unlawfully had carnal knowledge of the seven-year-old victim, as established by the credible testimony of the victim, corroborated by medical evidence, circumstantial evidence, and the accused's own statements placing him at the scene. The accused's denial was unsubstantiated and his failure to cross-examine the victim amounted to admission of her evidence.
- Citation
- [2025] GHAHC 24
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Stephen Ofori
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2025
- Case Number
- CCD/CC6/11/24
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Sexual Offences, Child Protection, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Stephen Ofori
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused committed the offence of defilement under Section 101(2) of the Criminal Offences Act 1960 (Act 29)
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt
- 3 Whether the evidence of the victim, corroborated by medical and circumstantial evidence, is sufficient for conviction
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused, Stephen Ofori, unlawfully had carnal knowledge of the seven-year-old victim, as established by the credible testimony of the victim, corroborated by medical evidence, circumstantial evidence, and the accused's own statements placing him at the scene. The accused's denial was unsubstantiated and his failure to cross-examine the victim amounted to admission of her evidence.
Court Disposition
conviction
Orders
- The accused, Stephen Ofori, is found guilty of defilement and convicted accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment