MUSA VRS. KARIM (PA/0770/2023) [2024] GHAHC -1 (22 January 2024)
Applicant failed to establish prior legal representation by the 1st defendant or his firm; mere preparation of the Will does not create a lawyer-client relationship or conflict of interest. No evidence of legal service or possession of information to applicant's disadvantage was provided.
- Citation
- MUSA VRS. KARIM (PA/0770/2023) [2024] GHAHC -1 (22 January 2024)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Hasia Musa; Defendant/respondent: Daniyal Abdul Karim; Defendant/respondent: Nadia Musa
- Court
- ghahc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Letters of Administration / Ruling on Application to Disqualify Counsel
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Disqualification of Counsel, Duty to Former Client, Conflict of Interest
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hasia Musa
Plaintiff/applicant
Daniyal Abdul Karim
Defendant/respondent
Nadia Musa
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Probate and Letters of Administration / Ruling on Application to Disqualify Counsel
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether counsel for the respondents should be disqualified for conflict of interest under the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquettes) Rules, 2020 (LI 2423)
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to establish prior legal representation by the 1st defendant or his firm; mere preparation of the Will does not create a lawyer-client relationship or conflict of interest. No evidence of legal service or possession of information to applicant's disadvantage was provided.
Court Disposition
application refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment