KOOMSON VRS. AMOATEY AND ANOTHER (GJ/0037/2024) [2024] GHAHC 410 (31 October 2024)
The Plaintiff, having paid more than 50% of the purchase price by April 1, 2023, and subsequently the full purchase price, is entitled to specific performance, vacant possession, and registration of title. The Defendants' refusal to deliver possession constitutes breach of contract. The Defendants' allegation of fraud was not proved to the requisite standard. The only remedy available to Defendants for late payment was a 10% penalty, not rescission. The varied payment plan agreement governs the parties' rights and obligations.
- Citation
- KOOMSON VRS. AMOATEY AND ANOTHER (GJ/0037/2024) [2024] GHAHC 410 (31 October 2024)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Emmanuel Koomson; 1st Defendant: Tsuianaa Amoatey; 2nd Defendant: Francis Nyakotey
- Court
- ghahc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiff; Defendants' counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Sale of Land, Breach of Contract, Damages, Injunction, Variation of Contract, Fraud Allegation
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emmanuel Koomson
Plaintiff
Tsuianaa Amoatey
1st Defendant
Francis Nyakotey
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Defendants were mandated under the Property Purchase Agreement to execute a Deed of Assignment and deliver documents upon receipt of US$25,000.00
- 2 Whether 1st Defendant’s interest in the property was fully transferred to Plaintiff after execution of the Deed of Assignment
- 3 Whether Defendants agreed to give Plaintiff peaceful vacant possession upon receipt of 50% of the purchase price
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff, having paid more than 50% of the purchase price by April 1, 2023, and subsequently the full purchase price, is entitled to specific performance, vacant possession, and registration of title. The Defendants' refusal to deliver possession constitutes breach of contract. The Defendants' allegation of fraud was not proved to the requisite standard. The only remedy available to Defendants for late payment was a 10% penalty, not rescission. The varied payment plan agreement governs the parties' rights and obligations.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiff; Defendants' counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration of entitlement to specific performance for Plaintiff
- Order for Defendants to deliver peaceful and vacant possession to Plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment