Seke Vrs Ametefe & Another [2022] GHAHC 96 (20 October 2022)
The arbitration conducted by Togbe Keh XI in 1991 was valid and binding on both parties. The award provided for joint control and cultivation of the land by both parties’ families. Plaintiff, as a party to the arbitration, is bound by the award and cannot treat defendants as trespassers. Both parties are entitled to farm on the land as successors to the original parties to the arbitration.
- Citation
- [2022] GHAHC 96
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Emmanuel Kosi Seke; Defendant: Christian Ametefe; Defendant: Michael Ametefe
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed in its entirety.
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Title, Customary Arbitration, Estoppel Per Rem Judicatum, Trespass, Recovery of Possession
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emmanuel Kosi Seke
Plaintiff
Christian Ametefe
Defendant
Michael Ametefe
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants have trespassed onto plaintiff’s land
- 2 Whether there was a valid arbitration between the parties and whether it operates as estoppel
- 3 Whether the land belongs to the Amii family
Ratio Decidendi
The arbitration conducted by Togbe Keh XI in 1991 was valid and binding on both parties. The award provided for joint control and cultivation of the land by both parties’ families. Plaintiff, as a party to the arbitration, is bound by the award and cannot treat defendants as trespassers. Both parties are entitled to farm on the land as successors to the original parties to the arbitration.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed in its entirety.
Orders
- Plaintiff's suit dismissed
- Defendants awarded costs of Ghs2,500.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment