Asante Vrs Republic [2017] GHASC 3 (26 January 2017)
The conviction for defilement could not be supported by the totality of the evidence, particularly in light of the DNA evidence excluding the appellant as the father of the child and the lack of credible corroborative evidence supporting the victim's testimony. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
- Citation
- [2017] GHASC 3
- Parties
- Appellant: Eric Asante; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal (supreme Court)
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; appellant acquitted
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Burden of Proof, Corroboration, DNA Evidence, Credibility of Witnesses
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric Asante
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal (supreme Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for defilement was supported by the evidence on record
- 2 Whether the absence of DNA evidence linking the appellant to the pregnancy undermined the conviction
- 3 Whether the victim's testimony was credible and corroborated
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction for defilement could not be supported by the totality of the evidence, particularly in light of the DNA evidence excluding the appellant as the father of the child and the lack of credible corroborative evidence supporting the victim's testimony. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; appellant acquitted
Orders
- Appellant acquitted of the offence of defilement
- No order of discharge as sentence already served
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment