The Republic Vrs The Executive Officer Food and Drugs Authority Exparte Darko [2023] GHACA 2 (19 April 2023)
The court granted the stay of proceedings because the appeal, if successful, would be rendered nugatory and the contempt application had not yet been moved in the lower court.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] GHACA 2
- Parties
- Respondent: The Republic; Respondent: Executive Officer, Food and Drugs Authority; Applicant: Eric Darko
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Proceedings / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application for stay of proceedings pending appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Contempt of Court, Appeals
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Respondent
Executive Officer, Food and Drugs Authority
Respondent
Eric Darko
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Proceedings / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for stay of proceedings pending appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the contempt application is ripe for ruling
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted the stay of proceedings because the appeal, if successful, would be rendered nugatory and the contempt application had not yet been moved in the lower court.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of proceedings pending appeal granted
Orders
- Stay of proceedings pending appeal is hereby granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL ACCRA – GHANA AD – 2023 Coram: - M. Welbourne (Mrs), J. A. (Presiding) Bernasko-Essah (Mrs.), J. A. Noble-Nkrumah, J. A. Suit No. H3/382/2023 Date: 19th April, 2023 THE REPUBLIC VRS THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER FOOD AND DRUGS AUTHORITY == RESPONDENT EXPARTE: ERIC DARKO == APPLICANT ========================================================== ========================================================== RULING WELBOURNE, JA We have read all the processes in the ma3er and listened to both learned counsel’s submissions. We have not been satisfied that the ma3er is ripe for a Ruling on the contempt application before the trial court. 1 We note that counsel for the Respondent indicated that the trial court made an order for the parties to file Wri3en Submissions on the issue of the Contempt Application. The Applicant denies that any such order was made and we do not find any evidence of this from the available records before us. We do not find that this application is one seeking to arrest the Ruling on the Contempt Application as the Respondent seeks to urge on us. Indeed there is an appeal pending against the refusal to Cross-examine the Respondent by the trial judge. We are constrained to grant the application for Stay of Proceedings, in the event that the appeal if successful, will not be rendered nugatory. Also because the application for contempt has not yet been moved at the court below. The application for stay of proceedings pending appeal is hereby granted (Sgd) Margaret Welbourne (Mrs.) (Justice of Appeal) (Sgd) I agree S. R. Bernasko-Essah (Mrs.) (Justice of Appeal) (Sgd) 2 I Also Agree Jerome Noble-Nkrumah (Justice of Appeal) 3