Ghana Judgment

ghaca

Republic -vrs- Executive Officer Food & Drugs Authority [2023] GHACA 65 (19 April 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The application for stay of proceedings pending appeal is granted because the appeal, if successful, would otherwise be rendered nugatory and the contempt application has not yet been moved at the court below.

Court disposition

application granted

Orders

  • stay of proceedings pending appeal granted

02

Material facts

Parties

The Republic

Respondent

The Executive Officer, Food and Drugs Authority

Respondent

Eric Darko

Applicant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal / Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant denies that the trial court ordered parties to file written submissions on the contempt application and contends the application is not to arrest the ruling on contempt.
Respondent
Respondent asserts that the trial court ordered written submissions and argues the application seeks to arrest the ruling on the contempt application.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court of Appeal reasoning

    Stay of proceedings may be granted to prevent appeal from being rendered nugatory.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The application for stay of proceedings pending appeal is granted because the appeal, if successful, would otherwise be rendered nugatory and the contempt application has not yet been moved at the court below.

Court disposition

application granted

  • stay of proceedings pending appeal granted

Source and reliance status

ghaca · 19 April 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

ghaca

Judgment· 19 April 2023

Republic -vrs- Executive Officer Food & Drugs Authority [2023] GHACA 65 (19 April 2023)

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL ACCRA – GHANA AD – 2023 Coram: - M. Welbourne (Mrs), J.A. (Presiding) Bernasko-Essah (Mrs.), J.A. Noble-Nkrumah, J.A. Suit No. H3/382/2023 Date: 19th April, 2023

THE REPUBLIC

VRS

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

FOOD AND DRUGS AUTHORITY EXPARTE: ERIC DARKO == ==

RESPONDENT

APPLICANT ==========================================================

RULING ========================================================== WELBOURNE, JA We have read all the processes in the matter and listened to both learned counsel’s submissions. We have not been satisfied that the matter is ripe for a Ruling on the contempt application before the trial court. 1 We note that counsel for the Respondent indicated that the trial court made an order for the parties to file Written Submissions on the issue of the Contempt Application. The Applicant denies that any such order was made and we do not find any evidence of this from the available records before us. We do not find that this application is one seeking to arrest the Ruling on the Contempt Application as the Respondent seeks to urge on us. Indeed there is an appeal pending against the refusal to Cross-examine the Respondent by the trial judge. We are constrained to grant the application for Stay of Proceedings, in the event that the appeal if successful, will not be rendered nugatory. Also because the application for contempt has not yet been moved at the court below. The application for stay of proceedings pending appeal is hereby granted (Sgd) Margaret Welbourne (Mrs.) (Justice of Appeal) (Sgd) S. R. Bernasko-Essah (Mrs.) (Justice of Appeal) I agree I Also Agree Jerome Noble-Nkrumah (Sgd) 2 (Justice of Appeal) 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.