EUGENE ASIAMAH BOADI -VRS- REPUBLIC [2023] GHACA 97 (26 January 2023)

EUGENE ASIAMAH BOADI -VRS- REPUBLIC [2023] GHACA 97 (26 January 2023)

No trust relationship was created between MET Capital (or the accused) and Airport West Hotel under the contract. The funds were not held in trust, and the accused, as CEO, cannot be held criminally liable for breach of trust or money laundering. The trial judge erred in making findings at the close of the prosecution's case and in relying on inadmissible statements. The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case. The proper remedy is civil, not criminal.

Citation
[2023] GHACA 97
Parties
Appellant: Eugene Asiamah Boadi; Respondent: The Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
26 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Ruling on Submission of No Case
Outcome
appeal allowed; accused acquitted and discharged
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Breach of Trust, Money Laundering, Corporate Veil, Burden of Proof, Trust Law, Breach of Contract
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eugene Asiamah Boadi

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Ruling on Submission of No Case

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case for fraudulent breach of trust and money laundering against the accused
  2. 2 Whether a trust relationship existed between the accused (or MET Capital) and the complainant (Airport West Hotel)
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge erred in making findings at the close of the prosecution's case

Ratio Decidendi

No trust relationship was created between MET Capital (or the accused) and Airport West Hotel under the contract. The funds were not held in trust, and the accused, as CEO, cannot be held criminally liable for breach of trust or money laundering. The trial judge erred in making findings at the close of the prosecution's case and in relying on inadmissible statements. The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case. The proper remedy is civil, not criminal.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; accused acquitted and discharged

Orders

  • Submission of no case upheld
  • Accused acquitted and discharged of all charges