GANYO VRS KRAH (A1/12/21) [2024] GHADC 117 (13 March 2024)
Plaintiff established identity and boundaries of land per sale agreement; Defendant’s evidence was contradictory and not credible regarding boundaries; survey report partially corroborated Plaintiff’s claim; Defendant trespassed on 0.11 acres of Plaintiff’s land.
- Citation
- GANYO VRS KRAH (A1/12/21) [2024] GHADC 117 (13 March 2024)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Felix Kwame Ganyo; Defendant: Ama Krah
- Court
- ghadc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Title to Land, Trespass, Injunction, Damages
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Felix Kwame Ganyo
Plaintiff
Ama Krah
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant trespassed onto a portion of the Plaintiff’s land
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to declaration of title, injunction, and damages
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff established identity and boundaries of land per sale agreement; Defendant’s evidence was contradictory and not credible regarding boundaries; survey report partially corroborated Plaintiff’s claim; Defendant trespassed on 0.11 acres of Plaintiff’s land.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiff
Orders
- Plaintiff declared owner of two acres of farmland at Akwatesu, Akim Swedru.
- Any purported sale of 0.11 acres or part of Plaintiff’s land by Defendant is null and void.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment