Owusu Sekyere Vrs. Abbey-Quaye (A4/20/2022) [2022] GHADC 395 (18 November 2022)
The petitioner failed to prove unreasonable behaviour by the respondent, but the uncontroverted evidence of nine years of separation and failed reconciliation attempts satisfies the statutory ground for dissolution under section 2(1)(e) and (f) of Act 367. The marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation and must be dissolved.
- Citation
- [2022] GHADC 395
- Parties
- Petitioner: Alice Owusu Sekyere; Respondent: Francis Yaw Abbey-Quaye
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2022
- Case Number
- A4/20/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Marriage, Custody of Children, Unreasonable Behaviour, Separation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alice Owusu Sekyere
Petitioner
Francis Yaw Abbey-Quaye
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the parties has broken down beyond reconciliation
- 2 Whether the petitioner has established unreasonable behaviour by the respondent
- 3 Custody of minor children
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioner failed to prove unreasonable behaviour by the respondent, but the uncontroverted evidence of nine years of separation and failed reconciliation attempts satisfies the statutory ground for dissolution under section 2(1)(e) and (f) of Act 367. The marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation and must be dissolved.
Court Disposition
petition granted
Orders
- The marriage celebrated under the Marriage Ordinance Cap 127 on 5th June 1999 is dissolved and cancelled.
- Custody of the last child and any other minor child is granted to the respondent with reasonable access to the petitioner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment