Oforiwaa Vrs Amenor and Another [2023] GHADC 343 (23 January 2023)
The 1st defendant admitted the motorbike was missing after being entrusted to him and failed to exercise due care, making him liable to pay the current market price to the plaintiff. The 2nd defendant was not a party to the agreement or a guarantor and is therefore non-suited.
- Citation
- [2023] GHADC 343
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Francisca Abena Oforiwaa; 1st Defendant: Prince Atsu Amenor; 2nd Defendant: Brother Agbey Amevor
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff against the 1st defendant; 2nd defendant non-suited
- Legal Topics
- Hire Purchase, Work and Pay Agreement, Loss of Property, Liability for Lost Goods
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francisca Abena Oforiwaa
Plaintiff
Prince Atsu Amenor
1st Defendant
Brother Agbey Amevor
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st defendant is liable to pay for the missing motorbike under the work-and-pay agreement
- 2 Whether the 2nd defendant is liable as a guarantor
Ratio Decidendi
The 1st defendant admitted the motorbike was missing after being entrusted to him and failed to exercise due care, making him liable to pay the current market price to the plaintiff. The 2nd defendant was not a party to the agreement or a guarantor and is therefore non-suited.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff against the 1st defendant; 2nd defendant non-suited
Orders
- 1st defendant to pay the current market price of the Huaoju Motorbike to the plaintiff
- Costs of GH¢500 awarded to the plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment