Enyerem Vrs Logistics Inc Ltd and Others [2016] GHASC 25 (5 December 2016)
The Attorney-General can represent the Registrar, High Court, Tema (6th Defendant) in the pending civil suit because such representation does not, in the circumstances of this case, undermine judicial independence, create a conflict of interest, or compromise the office of the Registrar. Each case must be assessed individually, but on these facts, the representation is legitimate and constitutional.
- Citation
- [2016] GHASC 25
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Frank Otah Enyerem; 1st Defendant: Logistics Inc. Limited; 2nd Defendant: Mr. Dompreh; 3rd Defendant: P. S. C. Tema Shipyard Ltd; 4th Defendant: Maxwell Forson; 5th Defendant: Seth Kublenu; 6th Defendant: The Registrar, High Court, Tema
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 5 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Reference / Judgment on Preliminary Objection (reference From High Court)
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection dismissed; Attorney-General permitted to represent 6th Defendant
- Legal Topics
- Attorney General's Representation, Judicial Independence, Separation of Powers
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frank Otah Enyerem
Plaintiff
Logistics Inc. Limited
1st Defendant
Mr. Dompreh
2nd Defendant
P. S. C. Tema Shipyard Ltd
3rd Defendant
Maxwell Forson
4th Defendant
Seth Kublenu
5th Defendant
The Registrar, High Court, Tema
6th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Reference / Judgment on Preliminary Objection (reference From High Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Attorney-General can properly represent the Registrar, High Court, Tema (a judicial officer) in a civil suit under the 1992 Constitution
- 2 Whether such representation contravenes the independence of the Judiciary as guaranteed by the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The Attorney-General can represent the Registrar, High Court, Tema (6th Defendant) in the pending civil suit because such representation does not, in the circumstances of this case, undermine judicial independence, create a conflict of interest, or compromise the office of the Registrar. Each case must be assessed individually, but on these facts, the representation is legitimate and constitutional.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection dismissed; Attorney-General permitted to represent 6th Defendant
Orders
- The High Court, Tema, or any other presiding Judge, is to continue the suit with the Attorney-General representing the 6th Defendant in terms of the Supreme Court's orders and judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment