OFFEH VRS. PREMPEH AND OTHERS (C7/34/2017) [2024] GHAHC 168 (26 January 2024)
The Will of Edward Kwaku Offeh was validly executed, the deceased had testamentary capacity, the Will met statutory requirements, and the inclusion of a predeceased beneficiary or revocation of customary gifts did not affect validity. House number 51, Asesewa, Odumasi, Asante-Akim/Ashanti was not the deceased's property and could not be devised by him.
- Citation
- OFFEH VRS. PREMPEH AND OTHERS (C7/34/2017) [2024] GHAHC 168 (26 January 2024)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Grace Offeh; Defendant: Kwasi Prempeh; Defendant: Dina Kwaanimaah; Defendant: Michael Amponsah Offeh; Defendant: Joseph Donkor Offeh; Defendant: Kwasi Appiah; Defendant: Victoria Asare Bediako alias Birago
- Court
- ghahc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims for invalidity, intestacy, and distribution under Intestate Succession Law dismissed; declaration granted that house number 51, Asesewa, Odumasi, Asante-Akim/Ashanti was not the deceased's property and he had no testamentary capacity over it; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Will Validity, Testamentary Capacity, Customary Gifts, Intestate Succession, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grace Offeh
Plaintiff
Kwasi Prempeh
Defendant
Dina Kwaanimaah
Defendant
Michael Amponsah Offeh
Defendant
Joseph Donkor Offeh
Defendant
Kwasi Appiah
Defendant
Victoria Asare Bediako alias Birago
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the purported Will of Edward Kwaku Offeh was the voluntary act and deed of the testator
- 2 Whether Edward Kwaku Offeh had testamentary capacity
- 3 Whether the Will bears the genuine signature of the testator
Ratio Decidendi
The Will of Edward Kwaku Offeh was validly executed, the deceased had testamentary capacity, the Will met statutory requirements, and the inclusion of a predeceased beneficiary or revocation of customary gifts did not affect validity. House number 51, Asesewa, Odumasi, Asante-Akim/Ashanti was not the deceased's property and could not be devised by him.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims for invalidity, intestacy, and distribution under Intestate Succession Law dismissed; declaration granted that house number 51, Asesewa, Odumasi, Asante-Akim/Ashanti was not the deceased's property and he had no testamentary capacity over it; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Probate granted for Will dated 11th January 2011
- Declaration that house number 51, Asesewa, Odumasi, Asante-Akim/Ashanti was not the deceased's property and could not be devised
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment