MOHAMMED VRS SULEMANA (C5/93/2023) [2024] GHACC 3 (19 January 2024)

Serious differences exist between the parties, and after diligent efforts, they have been unable to reconcile. The evidence supports that the marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation within the meaning of section 2(1)(f) of Act 367. Both parties agree to dissolution and have settled ancillary reliefs.

Citation: MOHAMMED VRS SULEMANA (C5/93/2023) [2024] GHACC 3 (19 January 2024)
Parties: Petitioner: Dr. Salifu Mohammed; Respondent: Heara Sulemana
Court: ghacc
Jurisdiction: Ghana
Judgment Date: 19 January 2024
Procedural Posture: Divorce Petition and Cross Petition / Final Judgment
Outcome: Decree of dissolution of marriage granted; petition and cross-petition allowed.
Legal Topics: Divorce, Matrimonial Property, Maintenance, Financial Provision, Dissolution of Marriage
Source Language: eng

Family Law Divorce Matrimonial Property Maintenance Financial Provision Dissolution of Marriage

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Dr. Salifu Mohammed

Petitioner

Heara Sulemana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Petition and Cross Petition / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the marriage celebrated between the petitioner and the respondent has broken down beyond reconciliation.

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Decree of dissolution of marriage granted; petition and cross-petition allowed.

Orders

Decree for dissolution of the ordinance marriage celebrated on 9th November 2022.
Parties to present original marriage certificate for cancellation by the Registrar.