Mohammed Vrs Tetteh [2023] GHAHC 112 (2 May 2023)
Both parties must be restrained from dealing with the disputed land to maintain the status quo ante until final determination, as neither party's right to proceed is established at this interlocutory stage and the balance of convenience requires preservation of the property.
- Citation
- [2023] GHAHC 112
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Abdulai Mohammed; Defendant/respondent: Emmanuel Tetteh a.k.a. Papa
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 2 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Land Dispute / Interlocutory Application for Injunction
- Outcome
- interlocutory injunction granted against both parties
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunction, Status Quo, Ownership Dispute, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdulai Mohammed
Plaintiff/applicant
Emmanuel Tetteh a.k.a. Papa
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Land Dispute / Interlocutory Application for Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining the respondent from dealing with the disputed land pending determination of the suit
- 2 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of court process
Ratio Decidendi
Both parties must be restrained from dealing with the disputed land to maintain the status quo ante until final determination, as neither party's right to proceed is established at this interlocutory stage and the balance of convenience requires preservation of the property.
Court Disposition
interlocutory injunction granted against both parties
Orders
- Both parties, their privies, assigns, agents, workmen and all persons working through them are restrained from dealing or interfering with the land in dispute in any way until the final determination of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment