KWAME VRS FORDJOUR & ANOTHER (BR/SP/DC/A1/04/22) [2024] GHADC 263 (12 June 2024)
Plaintiff failed to prove by credible evidence the customary gift, identity, and boundaries of the disputed land; defendants' evidence was preferred and established their ownership.
- Citation
- KWAME VRS FORDJOUR & ANOTHER (BR/SP/DC/A1/04/22) [2024] GHADC 263 (12 June 2024)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Sah Kwame; 1st Defendant: Kwadwo Fordjour; 2nd Defendant: Kwadwo Sampson
- Court
- ghadc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Land Dispute / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims dismissed; judgment for defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Title, Recovery of Possession, Injunction, Customary Gift of Land, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
John Sah Kwame
Plaintiff
Kwadwo Fordjour
1st Defendant
Kwadwo Sampson
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Land Dispute / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to declaration of title, recovery of possession, and injunction over the disputed land based on an alleged customary gift in 1972
- 2 Whether the defendants are entitled to ownership of the disputed land
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff failed to prove by credible evidence the customary gift, identity, and boundaries of the disputed land; defendants' evidence was preferred and established their ownership.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims dismissed; judgment for defendants.
Orders
- Title to the disputed land at Zamgboo, Duadaso No. 2 stool lands, declared for defendants.
- Defendants adjudged true owners of the land.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment