Bediako Vrs Acheampong [2018] GHASC 54 (28 November 2018)
The Supreme Court affirmed the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts that the property should be shared equally between the parties, applying the equality is equity principle due to the impossibility of reliably apportioning individual contributions, and found no merit in the grounds of appeal.
- Citation
- [2018] GHASC 54
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent/respondent: Adu Bediako; Defendant/appellant/appellant: Kwame Acheampong
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Joint Ownership, Accounting, Injunction, Valuation, Appeals
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adu Bediako
Plaintiff/respondent/respondent
Kwame Acheampong
Defendant/appellant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property should be shared equally between the parties based on the 'equality is equity' principle
- 2 Whether the trial and appellate courts erred in their findings of fact and application of the law
- 3 Whether the judgment was against the weight of evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court affirmed the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts that the property should be shared equally between the parties, applying the equality is equity principle due to the impossibility of reliably apportioning individual contributions, and found no merit in the grounds of appeal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal affirmed
- Property to be shared equally between the parties
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment