GODFRED AWULEY ANKRAH VRS JOYCE GIDI (C5/68/2022) [2022] GHACC 339 (13 October 2022)

GODFRED AWULEY ANKRAH VRS JOYCE GIDI (C5/68/2022) [2022] GHACC 339 (13 October 2022)

Both parties admitted the marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation and all reconciliation efforts failed; respondent's adultery was admitted but petitioner did not find it intolerable to live with her; respondent failed to prove substantial contribution to matrimonial home or joint acquisition of vehicles; financial settlement awarded based on needs and obligations; catering facility to be shared equally as both parties contributed; claims for equal share of home, vehicles, and accounting for commercial use dismissed.

Citation
[2022] GHACC 339
Parties
Petitioner: Godfred Awuley Ankrah; Respondent: Joyce Gidi
Court
Circuit Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
13 October 2022
Case Number
C5/68/2022
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition and Cross Petition / Final Judgment
Outcome
Petition and cross-petition for dissolution of marriage granted; ancillary reliefs partially granted and partially dismissed.
Legal Topics
Divorce, Matrimonial Property, Financial Settlement, Child Maintenance, Custody
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfred Awuley Ankrah

Petitioner

Joyce Gidi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Petition and Cross Petition / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to a lump sum payment of Ghs 50,000
  3. 3 Whether the matrimonial home is jointly acquired property and should be distributed equally

Ratio Decidendi

Both parties admitted the marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation and all reconciliation efforts failed; respondent's adultery was admitted but petitioner did not find it intolerable to live with her; respondent failed to prove substantial contribution to matrimonial home or joint acquisition of vehicles; financial settlement awarded based on needs and obligations; catering facility to be shared equally as both parties contributed; claims for equal share of home, vehicles, and accounting for commercial use dismissed.

Court Disposition

Petition and cross-petition for dissolution of marriage granted; ancillary reliefs partially granted and partially dismissed.

Orders

  • Decree of dissolution of marriage issued; marriage certificate cancelled; registrar to notify church administrator.
  • Petitioner to pay respondent Ghs 25,000 as financial settlement within 90 days, failing which interest accrues at prevailing commercial bank rate.