Kmk Ltd and Others Vrs Agricultural Development Bank Ltd and Another [2014] GHASC 160 (29 May 2014)
No special or exceptional circumstances exist to warrant review or variation of the single judge's order refusing stay of execution, as the execution and auction sale were void for want of leave, and applicants were not the highest bidders at auction.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] GHASC 160
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant/respondent: KMK LTD; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent: Kwabena Adutwum; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent: Selina Owusu; Defendant/respondent: Agricultural Development Bank Ltd; Co Defendant/respondent/applicant: Kumesh (GH) Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review Motion (single Judge) / Ruling on Application to Vary Single Judge's Order Refusing Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Review of Judicial Orders, Auction Sales, Execution of Judgments
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KMK LTD
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent
Kwabena Adutwum
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent
Selina Owusu
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent
Agricultural Development Bank Ltd
Defendant/respondent
Kumesh (GH) Ltd
Co Defendant/respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Review Motion (single Judge) / Ruling on Application to Vary Single Judge's Order Refusing Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether special circumstances exist to warrant review of the single judge's order refusing stay of execution
- 2 Whether execution and auction sale of property was valid
- 3 Whether applicants were bona fide purchasers and highest bidders at auction
Ratio Decidendi
No special or exceptional circumstances exist to warrant review or variation of the single judge's order refusing stay of execution, as the execution and auction sale were void for want of leave, and applicants were not the highest bidders at auction.
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed
Orders
- Applicants given three months from date of ruling to vacate the premises
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment