MENSAH VRS DAUDA (A1/26/12) [2024] GHADC 362 (1 July 2024)

MENSAH VRS DAUDA (A1/26/12) [2024] GHADC 362 (1 July 2024)

The plaintiff's claims are barred by res judicata as the issues, parties, and subject matter were previously adjudicated in a final judgment, which remains unchallenged and binding. The proper remedy was appeal or setting aside the prior judgment, not relitigation.

Citation
MENSAH VRS DAUDA (A1/26/12) [2024] GHADC 362 (1 July 2024)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kofi Mensah; Defendant: Amidu Dauda
Court
ghadc
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
1 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's action dismissed as estopped by res judicata.
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Estoppel, Land Ownership, Trespass
Source Language
eng
Property Law Civil Procedure Res Judicata Estoppel Land Ownership Trespass

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kofi Mensah

Plaintiff

Amidu Dauda

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is estopped by res judicata from relitigating ownership and possession of the disputed plots
  2. 2 Whether the defendant has trespassed onto the plaintiff's land

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's claims are barred by res judicata as the issues, parties, and subject matter were previously adjudicated in a final judgment, which remains unchallenged and binding. The proper remedy was appeal or setting aside the prior judgment, not relitigation.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's action dismissed as estopped by res judicata.

Orders

  • Plaintiff's suit is dismissed.
  • Defendant awarded costs of GHS 7000.00 with interest at 24.8% per annum.