Agyemang Vrs Fio and Another [2023] GHADC 363 (28 July 2023)
Plaintiff established a better equitable interest in the land through evidence of purchase and identification of boundaries, while Defendants failed to prove valid title or proper customary grant; thus, the balance of probabilities favours Plaintiff.
- Citation
- [2023] GHADC 363
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kwabena Agyemang; Defendant: Ataa Fio; Defendant: Brother Kwadwo
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Title, Trespass, Recovery of Possession, Perpetual Injunction, Burden of Proof, Customary Law Grant
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kwabena Agyemang
Plaintiff
Ataa Fio
Defendant
Brother Kwadwo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to declaration of title to the land in dispute
- 2 Whether an order for perpetual injunction should be directed at the Defendants from interfering with the land in dispute
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff established a better equitable interest in the land through evidence of purchase and identification of boundaries, while Defendants failed to prove valid title or proper customary grant; thus, the balance of probabilities favours Plaintiff.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff
Orders
- Declaration of title to the parcel of land in dispute as described in the Schedule of the Amended Statement of Claim and in Exhibits 'A' and 'A1'.
- Defendants, their agents, assigns, privies, etc. are restrained from interfering with the land described in the Schedule of the Amended Statement of Claim and in Exhibits 'A' and 'A1'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment