Prempeh Vrs Kwapong [2020] GHASC 53 (21 October 2020)
The plaintiff failed to prove root of title to the disputed land, and the land falls within the Osae Family's land as previously adjudged. Acts of possession by the plaintiff were insufficient to establish ownership. No grounds exist to disturb concurrent findings of the lower courts.
- Citation
- Prempeh Vrs Kwapong [2020] GHASC 53 (21 October 2020)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant/appellant: Agya Boakye Atonsah Prempeh; Defendant/respondent/respondent: Eric Ofei-Kwapong
- Court
- ghasc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Land Ownership, Title Dispute, Concurrent Findings, Boundary Determination
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agya Boakye Atonsah Prempeh
Plaintiff/appellant/appellant
Eric Ofei-Kwapong
Defendant/respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff proved root of title to the disputed land
- 2 Whether the disputed land falls within the defendant's grantor's land as adjudged by the Supreme Court
- 3 Whether acts of possession by the plaintiff are sufficient to establish ownership
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to prove root of title to the disputed land, and the land falls within the Osae Family's land as previously adjudged. Acts of possession by the plaintiff were insufficient to establish ownership. No grounds exist to disturb concurrent findings of the lower courts.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal fails in its entirety and is accordingly dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment