Mireku and Others Vrs Tetteh and Others [2011] GHASC 8 (9 February 2011)

Mireku and Others Vrs Tetteh and Others [2011] GHASC 8 (9 February 2011)

The lease agreement was not unconscionable as it was entered into by literate parties with legal advice, and the absence of a renewal clause did not render it unconscionable. The plaintiffs' repairs and improvements were obligations under the lease, and courts cannot impose a renewal where none was agreed. The appeal was dismissed and the Court of Appeal's decision affirmed.

Citation
[2011] GHASC 8
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Ben Mireku; Plaintiff/appellant: Gabriel Tetteh Mireku; Plaintiff/appellant: Kwasi Badu; Defendant/respondent: Archibald Okpon Tetteh; Defendant/respondent: Victoria Atswei; Defendant/respondent: Elizabeth Ajorkor; Defendant/respondent: Administrators of the Estate of Adjei Tetteh
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
9 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment (supreme Court)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Lease Agreements, Unconscionability, Statutory Tenancy, Renewal of Leases
Source Language
English
Land Law Contract Law Lease Agreements Unconscionability Statutory Tenancy Renewal of Leases

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ben Mireku

Plaintiff/appellant

Gabriel Tetteh Mireku

Plaintiff/appellant

Kwasi Badu

Plaintiff/appellant

Archibald Okpon Tetteh

Defendant/respondent

Victoria Atswei

Defendant/respondent

Elizabeth Ajorkor

Defendant/respondent

Administrators of the Estate of Adjei Tetteh

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment (supreme Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the lease agreement was unconscionable
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs could be declared statutory tenants
  3. 3 Whether the absence of a renewal clause rendered the lease unconscionable

Ratio Decidendi

The lease agreement was not unconscionable as it was entered into by literate parties with legal advice, and the absence of a renewal clause did not render it unconscionable. The plaintiffs' repairs and improvements were obligations under the lease, and courts cannot impose a renewal where none was agreed. The appeal was dismissed and the Court of Appeal's decision affirmed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed